system on chip field programmable gate array processor Search Results


twosex-mschart program  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments twosex-mschart program
Twosex Mschart Program, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pmc06330542-206-11-13?v=CH+Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
twosex-mschart program - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
instat software version 3.00  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc instat software version 3.00
Instat Software Version 3.00, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pm16421920-78-14-18?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
instat software version 3.00 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
prism 9 software package  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc prism 9 software package
Prism 9 Software Package, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/10__1016_slash_j__bsheal__2024__11__007-74-10-9?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
prism 9 software package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
instat software  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc instat software
Instat Software, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pmc06463447-87-14-16?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
instat software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-squared test performed in graphpad prism 5.0 software  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc chi-squared test performed in graphpad prism 5.0 software
Chi Squared Test Performed In Graphpad Prism 5.0 Software, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pmc06343184-81-13-12?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-squared test performed in graphpad prism 5.0 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
graphpad prism 8.1.1  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc graphpad prism 8.1.1
Graphpad Prism 8.1.1, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pm33852864-358-14-13?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
graphpad prism 8.1.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
real time qpcr  (Bio-Rad)
98
Bio-Rad real time qpcr
a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb <t>ChIP–qPCR</t> analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.
Real Time Qpcr, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pmc10113154-336-0-2?v=Bio-Rad
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
real time qpcr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sas 9.1 software  (SAS institute)
90
SAS institute sas 9.1 software
a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb <t>ChIP–qPCR</t> analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.
Sas 9.1 Software, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pm27115423-45-14-16?v=SAS+institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sas 9.1 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
jmp software, version 6.0  (SAS institute)
90
SAS institute jmp software, version 6.0
a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb <t>ChIP–qPCR</t> analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.
Jmp Software, Version 6.0, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pm21117288-39-19-23?v=SAS+institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
jmp software, version 6.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
20.121 statistical software  (MedCalc Software Ltd)
90
MedCalc Software Ltd 20.121 statistical software
a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb <t>ChIP–qPCR</t> analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.
20.121 Statistical Software, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pmc10564150-119-9-12?v=MedCalc+Software+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
20.121 statistical software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ver.21  (SPSS Inc)
90
SPSS Inc ver.21
a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb <t>ChIP–qPCR</t> analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.
Ver.21, supplied by SPSS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pmc04937765-63-10-9?v=SPSS+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ver.21 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
13.5 software  (SPSS Inc)
90
SPSS Inc 13.5 software
a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb <t>ChIP–qPCR</t> analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.
13.5 Software, supplied by SPSS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/system+on+chip+field+programmable+gate+array+processor/pmc03401889-47-13-12?v=SPSS+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
13.5 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb ChIP–qPCR analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.

Journal: Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Article Title: Loss of H3K9 trimethylation alters chromosome compaction and transcription factor retention during mitosis

doi: 10.1038/s41594-023-00943-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Volcano plots as in Fig. , highlighting pluripotency-associated factors that are enriched (red) or not significantly changed (black) on WT (left plot) or Suv39h dn (right plot) ESC mitotic chromosomes. b , Esrrb immunolabeling (red) of WT and Suv39h dn flow-sorted chromosomes 19 (left panel) and X (right panel), where DAPI counterstain is shown in light gray. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb mean intensities were measured across individual chromosomes; the mean ± s.d. is shown ( n = minimum 50 chromosomes analyzed over 3 independent experiments). P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. c , Esrrb ChIP–qPCR analysis in WT versus Suv39h dn mitotic and asynchronous ESCs. Enrichment (immunoprecipitated as a percentage of input (% IP)) was measured at Esrrb bookmarked sites ( Capn2 , Esrrb , Jam2-s1 , Jam2-s2 , Tbx3 and Tet2 ), Esrrb lost sites (bound only in interphase ; Mgat3 and Twistnb ) or control sites that do not bind Esrrb ( Esrrb-3 ′ and Actb ). The mean + s.d. results are shown. For interphase cells n = 3 biological replicates, for mitotic cells n = 4 biological replicates (except Capn2 , Esrrb , Rex1 and Jam2-s1 , where n = 5). d , Live-cell imaging of Esrrb–tdTomato mouse ESCs pretreated with DMSO (upper panel) or 100 nM of chaetocin (lower panel) cultured with SiR-DNA (red). Arrows show Esrrb localization to mitotic chromatin. Scale bar, 5 μm. Esrrb–tdTomato mean intensities on mitotic DNA (gated based on SiR-DNA signal) and in interphase nuclei were quantified for each condition; the mean ± s.d. is shown. For mitotic chromosomes: n = 25 (DMSO) or n = 35 (chaetocin) cells analyzed; for interphase nuclei: n = 46 cells analyzed for both DMSO and chaetocin treatments, representing 3 independent experiments. b – d , P values of statistically significant changes, measured by unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -tests, are indicated. and precise n numbers are provided.

Article Snippet: Real-time qPCR (BioRad, CFX96 system with CFX manager software) was performed in technical triplicate for each biological replicate, using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN) and the primers listed in Supplementary Table .

Techniques: Immunolabeling, Two Tailed Test, ChIP-qPCR, Immunoprecipitation, Control, Live Cell Imaging, Cell Culture